Skip directly to Accessibility Notice

SMH: Question & Answer

December 18, 2021

Read Time 5 MIN


Semiconductors have become crucial inputs in a wide array of technologies, from automobiles to mobile phones. The COVID-19 pandemic led to a dislocation of supply and demand which is expected to continue into the foreseeable future. The U.S., while a leading semiconductor designer, has lagged behind Asia in semiconductor manufacturing. This mismatch could potentially lead to the U.S. falling behind in the global tech innovation race, leading U.S. lawmakers to push for government support of this crucial industry. This blog is intended to answer frequently asked questions on semiconductors and more specifically, VanEck’s Semiconductor ETF (SMH).

Q: Why SMH and Why Semiconductors?

A: Global semiconductor sales have been increasing since last June. China led regional sales in March, followed by Japan and the rest of AsiaPac, the U.S. and Europe.

Strong demand for electronic devices, in part because of widespread remote working and homebased learning, coupled with the push towards digitization, have helped the chip industry strongly hold its ground against the ramifications of the pandemic, although this has led to a chip crunch. Demand for microchips was on the rise even before the pandemic disrupted supply chains and altered consumer needs. Visit the product page for more information on VanEck's Semiconductor ETF (SMH) here. .

Q: What is the general outlook for the semiconductor industry?

A: In our view, the outlook for the semiconductor industry remains healthy. As outlined in a piece we published earlier this year, semiconductors have become crucial components for many of the innovative technologies that are driving the global economy. Against this backdrop of tech innovation, semiconductor demand has remained very strong, and shows no signs of abating any time soon.

Q: Why are issues taking place in the supply chain?

A: The supply chain disruption that the semiconductor industry experienced in 2020 was the result of rapidly-shifting market dynamic related to the COVID-19 pandemic. According to the Semiconductor Industry Association, “The events leading to the current auto chip shortage began during the second quarter of 2020, when automakers understandably reduced production and chip purchases as the virus spread across the globe. Chipmakers, meanwhile, saw surging demand for semiconductors used to enable remote healthcare, work-at-home, and virtual learning, which were needed during the pandemic.”

Because semiconductor production is a complex, detailed operation, massive shifts in semiconductor production cannot be stopped and started immediately. Decisions by auto-manufacturers to slow production, combined with increased demand in work-from-home sectors, led to a perfect storm of mismatched supply and demand, which has yet to fully restabilize.

Another key facet to understanding the semiconductor shortage is the fact that a significant overlap between industries that rely upon the same semiconductor technology, now exists. In other words, multiple separate, distinct industries use the same type of semiconductors, leading to exacerbated dislocations of supply and demand, against the backdrop of the COVID-19 outbreak.

A final point to note is that the automotive industry appears to be experiencing the effects of the semiconductor shortage most acutely. According to Barrons1, this is due to a combination of factors, including increasing semiconductor usage in electric vehicles (EV), chip company reluctance to invest in older technology (i.e. cars), and continued growth in demand from the consumer services sector.

Q: When is the supply chain expected to return to normal?

A: According to McKinsey, the global auto semiconductor shortage is not expected to resolve itself in the short term. “That is primarily because of the continued increases in volume and sophistication levels of the chips needed to power new technologies, such as advanced driver-assistance systems and autonomous driving.”2

Over the long term, semiconductor buyers will need to closely coordinate with chip makers to ensure more stability in the supply and demand relationship. The same McKinsey report suggests that purchase agreement commitments shift to more binding arrangements, which has not historically been the standard. Additionally, there is a general consensus that more allocation of resources needs to be made to the semiconductor infrastructure, in the form of fabrication facilities, which would boost the production capacity of the industry as a whole.

Q: Is semiconductor manufacturing going to return to the United States?

A: The U.S. semiconductor industry accounts for 45-50% of global revenues, yet only accounts for 12% of the manufacturing. This mismatch has grown more pronounced since 1990, when the U.S. accounted for 37% of global semiconductor manufacturing.3

The semiconductor supply crisis has highlighted the risks associated with relying solely on offshore, non-U.S. semiconductor manufacturing. According to the SIA, with a continued reduced manufacturing footprint, the U.S. semiconductor industry runs the risk of lagging behind on the technological advances which will set the stage for future innovation. Essentially, the U.S. lagging could lead to more exponential lagging in the future.

Building semiconductor manufacturing operations is a huge capital investment, ranging between $10-$40 billion depending on the type of chip being produced. SIA estimates that the $20-$50 billion in federal grants would be needed over the next decade to reverse the loss of market share experienced in the last thirty years.

Q: Will the U.S. bake semiconductor support into infrastructure deals help to bridge the gap?

A: Discussions around government support for the semiconductor industry are ongoing. From the Wall Street Journal:

Lawmakers in both the Senate and the House have introduced legislation to provide government help and incentives to increase domestic production of semiconductors. They propose doing so in a measure known, perhaps inevitably, as the CHIPS Act, or the Creating Helpful Incentives to Produce Semiconductors for America Act. It would, among other things, fund research into semiconductor design and production; create a pool of federal money to give manufacturers incentives to build semiconductor manufacturing facilities in the U.S.; and provide a tax credit to those who do so.

The Senate last month passed, on a bipartisan vote, legislation that would provide $52 billion to start funding such initiatives. But that legislation hasn’t yet been acted on in the House.

Q: How to buy VanEck ETFs?

Have More Questions? - Ask VanEck

Have More Questions? - Ask VanEck

Additional Disclosure:




This is not an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation to buy or sell any of the securities/financial instruments mentioned herein. The information presented does not involve the rendering of personalized investment, financial, legal, or tax advice. Certain statements contained herein may constitute projections, forecasts and other forward looking statements, which do not reflect actual results, are valid as of the date of this communication and subject to change without notice. Information provided by third party sources are believed to be reliable and have not been independently verified for accuracy or completeness and cannot be guaranteed. VanEck does not guarantee the accuracy of third party data. The information herein represents the opinion of the author(s), but not necessarily those of VanEck.

An investment in the Fund may be subject to risks which include, among others, investing in the semiconductor industry, equity securities, foreign securities, foreign currency, depositary receipts, medium-capitalization companies, issuer-specific changes, market, operational, index tracking, authorized participant concentration, no guarantee of active trading market, trading issues, passive management, fund shares trading, premium/discount risk and liquidity of fund shares, non-diversified, and concentration risks, all of which may adversely affect the Fund. Foreign investments are subject to risks, which include changes in economic and political conditions, foreign currency fluctuations, changes in foreign regulations, and changes in currency exchange rates which may negatively impact the Fund's returns. Medium-capitalization companies may be subject to elevated risks.

Investing involves substantial risk and high volatility, including possible loss of principal. An investor should consider the investment objective, risks, charges and expenses of the Fund carefully before investing. To obtain a prospectus and summary prospectus, which contains this and other information, call 800.826.2333 or visit Please read the prospectus and summary prospectus carefully before investing.

1 - 3 of 3