Skip directly to Accessibility Notice
VanEck logo
  • Emerging Markets Equity

    Markets Stop Panicking When Central Banks Panic

    David Semple, Portfolio Manager, Emerging Markets Equity Strategy
    October 19, 2018

    In the following Q&A, Portfolio Manager David Semple explores the challenges that emerging markets faced in Q3, as well as the resulting volatility and, in our opinion, overreaction.

    David, a general note on 2018?

    We entered 2018 with much optimism about the strength of the fundamentals of emerging markets companies, which we believe is still the case. However starting February, macro events and political disputes took center stage and became the main market drivers.

    At this point in time, it is very important to put our investment process and philosophy into context. As part of our philosophy, we focus on investing in structural growth trends in emerging markets and at a reasonable price. As a result, we have consistent, persistent factor risk to growth, size, quality, and momentum and, typically, a high active share in pursuing the strategy. As we are always careful to explain to investors, when volatility rises, often there is a panic out of size and growth risks and active managers reduce active share and tracking error risk. If we try to follow the herd into more “defensive” parts of the emerging markets, we may risk missing whatever the trigger is for recovery. We would, in addition, be failing to execute the strategy as we have described it to our investors over the years.

    We continue to believe that the real story in emerging markets remains the long march of secular growth. Valuation is cheap and positioning is light. We are pleased with the resilience of earnings in emerging markets despite some revisions in the past quarter. This period may well be regarded in the future as one of the best buying opportunities into much discounted structural themes.

    Can you give us a market review of the year so far?

    The U.S. dollar and dollar liquidity, escalation of the trade war between U.S. and China, and a perceived slowdown in the Chinese economy were among the factors impacting the markets negatively. The combination of macro events has resulted in a tough year for both size and growth factors in emerging markets as investors have reduced risk either by raising cash or fleeing to safer spots in emerging markets. Based on MSCI Indices1, large caps and value companies outperformed their small caps and growth counterparts by 4.67% and 6.88%, respectively. The rise in oil prices, especially during the third quarter, helped the energy sector top the list of best performing sectors in 2018, by a wide margin, returning a positive 15.79% for the year, versus losses of 21.00% and 16.07%, respectively, for the worst performing sectors during the same period: consumer discretionary and financials. Our strategy’s focus on structural growth means that we tend to have low/no weighting in the energy sector, and persistent overweights in the consumer discretionary and healthcare sectors and a sizable allocation to financials and information technology, especially internet stocks. While this has helped the strategy’s performance over the medium and long term, clearly this was a particular headwind this year.

    On a country level, Russia and Colombia, also energy driven economies, performed best in 2018. Conversely, the accumulation of bad policies over the years caught up with Argentina and Turkey, leading to steep equity and currency losses. China and India were also down in 2018, each for different reasons, returning -8.98% and -9.60%, respectively.

    What are the primary catalysts that should get the markets back on track?

    Resolution of the same issues that are holding the markets back: A decrease in global risk, especially the trade dispute between the U.S. and China, a waning in the relative strength of both the U.S. dollar and the U.S. economy, anticipation of the peak of the interest rate cycle in the U.S., and better sentiment towards China with an appreciation of the impact of its stimulus measures.

    What about trade?

    While we can’t foresee where this mad dash to protectionism will eventually lead, we hope that saner heads prevail over time. But maybe that will come only when pain is apparent on both sides of the table. Tariffs are not “the greatest”. They are like sand in the wheels of the global economy. There is a secondary effect in terms of drag on investments, and ultimately growth, as exports get hit. However, in the past few years, emerging markets have been more dependent on domestic demand, and exports as a percentage of gross domestic product (GDP) has been declining.

    Will the contraction in U.S. dollar liquidity lead to an emerging markets contagion?

    As the tide has gone out due to U.S. Federal Reserve (Fed) tightening, some countries have been exposed without their bathing suits. Turkey and Argentina have been the starkest examples. Other countries such as Brazil, the Philippines, and Indonesia may also be facing difficulties.

    A contagion scenario similar to 1998 seems unlikely to us. The main reasons that the crisis in 1998 was as deep were external debt and pegged currencies. Both factors are much less of an issue today. Most debt is in local currencies, and almost all major emerging markets countries now have floating currencies, which they can use in addition to monetary policy to absorb shocks.

    What does the worst case scenario look like for Chinese markets this year?

    China has imbalances. Given the scale and the speed of its economic development, there are significant issues that need to be addressed. But China also has many more, and more effective, levers to influence its economic outcome in the shorter term. Tariffs alone, at the levels that have been postulated, will have a modest impact on the economy, almost completely negated by the fiscal, monetary, and currency measures that have been effected. The Chinese government has proven on multiple occasions to be competent with the will, expertise, and tools to control its quasi-command economy effectively. We don’t anticipate anything dramatic, but we wouldn’t be surprised to see some modest currency weakness, if the current trade dispute with the U.S. is extended and deepened.

    China is a large overweight. What is your base case?

    Actually, I prefer the expression “less underweight than rest of our peers” when discussing our weighting in China, given the true market capitalization of China within emerging markets, especially after you factor in the A Share market. Economic data have pointed to a slowdown in the Chinese economy in recent months. The effects of easing have not been reflected in hard economic data yet. But they will be. The government’s aim is to stabilize growth despite tariff related issues. It has engaged in monetary, fiscal, regulatory, and tariff measures to achieve that goal. Don’t fight Beijing… As the saying goes, “markets stop panicking when central banks start panicking”.

    What is your outlook for the U.S. dollar?

    The U.S. dollar has been relatively robust. So far this year, despite all the negative headlines, the USD is up only approximately 4%. On a Real Effective Exchange Rate (REER) basis, a measure used to compare currency valuation relative to other currency/currencies, the USD valuation is currently at multi-year highs compared to emerging markets local currencies. The U.S. is also facing the largest twin deficit on record, which, combined with likely political paralysis post-midterm elections, will make it hard for the dollar to perform, we believe. U.S. growth has been exceptionally high versus the rest of the world—we expect that advantage to diminish.

    How do emerging markets perform during interest rate hiking cycles?

    In the past such an environment has been positive for emerging markets, since it is a response to higher growth. However, we are also seeing signs of global central banks becoming more dovish in the face of market downturns. A slowdown in rate hikes from the Fed can be also very positive for emerging markets. The negative impact of U.S. rate hikes may be more negatively felt in countries with large funding requirements. Using the same image again, it is like when the tide goes out, we see who’s lacking a swimming suit. So far, Argentina and Turkey have been the first two countries to be impacted.

    Any final words on emerging markets?

    Let’s not forget why we are invested in emerging markets. Despite all the noise, the real story in emerging markets remains the long march of secular growth. We have seen this happen over and over again in the past 15 years. Markets tend to mean revert and reach new highs. Our conviction in emerging markets is high for many reasons. Growth in emerging markets is expected to pick up in the coming years, especially compared to developed markets. According to the IMF, India is expected to grow 7-8% and China is expected to maintain 6-6.5% growth, mostly driven by domestic demand. According to McKinsey, consumption in emerging markets is expected to hit $30 trillion by 2025, from $12 trillion in 2010. Growth in industries such as internet, e-commerce, payment, gaming, social media, healthcare, consumption, education, entertainment, furniture, and clean energy among others is still in nascent stages. Over the past 25 years, more than one billion people have been lifted from below poverty levels mostly in East and South Asia.

    Download full commentary PDF with Fund specific information and performance.
    For a complete listing of the holdings in VanEck Emerging Markets Fund (GBFAX) as of 9/30/18, please click on this PDF . Please note that these are not recommendations to buy or sell any security.